Examining the Details and Delete Methods
[!NOTE] An updated version of this tutorial is available here that uses ASP.NET MVC 5 and Visual Studio 2013. It’s more secure, much simpler to follow and demonstrates more features.
In this part of the tutorial, you’ll examine the automatically generated Details and Delete methods.
Examining the Details and Delete Methods
Open the Movie controller and examine the Details method.
[!code-csharpMain]
1: public ActionResult Details(int? id)
2: {
3: if (id == null)
4: {
5: return new HttpStatusCodeResult(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
6: }
7: Movie movie = db.Movies.Find(id);
8: if (movie == null)
9: {
10: return HttpNotFound();
11: }
12: return View(movie);
13: }
The MVC scaffolding engine that created this action method adds a comment showing a HTTP request that invokes the method. In this case it’s a GET request with three URL segments, the Movies controller, the Details method and a ID value.
Code First makes it easy to search for data using the Find method. An important security feature built into the method is that the code verifies that the Find method has found a movie before the code tries to do anything with it. For example, a hacker could introduce errors into the site by changing the URL created by the links from http://localhost:xxxx/Movies/Details/1 to something like http://localhost:xxxx/Movies/Details/12345 (or some other value that doesn’t represent an actual movie). If you did not check for a null movie, a null movie would result in a database error.
Examine the Delete and DeleteConfirmed methods.
[!code-csharpMain]
1: // GET: /Movies/Delete/5
2: public ActionResult Delete(int? id)
3: {
4: if (id == null)
5: {
6: return new HttpStatusCodeResult(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest);
7: }
8: Movie movie = db.Movies.Find(id);
9: if (movie == null)
10: {
11: return HttpNotFound();
12: }
13: return View(movie);
14: }
15:
16: // POST: /Movies/Delete/5
17: [HttpPost, ActionName("Delete")]
18: [ValidateAntiForgeryToken]
19: public ActionResult DeleteConfirmed(int id)
20: {
21: Movie movie = db.Movies.Find(id);
22: db.Movies.Remove(movie);
23: db.SaveChanges();
24: return RedirectToAction("Index");
25: }
Note that the HTTP Get``Delete method doesn’t delete the specified movie, it returns a view of the movie where you can submit (HttpPost) the deletion.. Performing a delete operation in response to a GET request (or for that matter, performing an edit operation, create operation, or any other operation that changes data) opens up a security hole. For more information about this, see Stephen Walther’s blog entry ASP.NET MVC Tip #46 — Don’t use Delete Links because they create Security Holes.
The HttpPost method that deletes the data is named DeleteConfirmed to give the HTTP POST method a unique signature or name. The two method signatures are shown below:
[!code-csharpMain]
1: // GET: /Movies/Delete/5
2: public ActionResult Delete(int? id)
3:
4: //
5: // POST: /Movies/Delete/5
6: [HttpPost, ActionName("Delete")]
7: public ActionResult DeleteConfirmed(int id)
The common language runtime (CLR) requires overloaded methods to have a unique parameter signature (same method name but different list of parameters). However, here you need two Delete methods – one for GET and one for POST – that both have the same parameter signature. (They both need to accept a single integer as a parameter.)
To sort this out, you can do a couple of things. One is to give the methods different names. That’s what the scaffolding mechanism did in the preceding example. However, this introduces a small problem: ASP.NET maps segments of a URL to action methods by name, and if you rename a method, routing normally wouldn’t be able to find that method. The solution is what you see in the example, which is to add the ActionName("Delete") attribute to the DeleteConfirmed method. This effectively performs mapping for the routing system so that a URL that includes /Delete/for a POST request will find the DeleteConfirmed method.
Another common way to avoid a problem with methods that have identical names and signatures is to artificially change the signature of the POST method to include an unused parameter. For example, some developers add a parameter type FormCollection that is passed to the POST method, and then simply don’t use the parameter:
[!code-csharpMain]
1: public ActionResult Delete(FormCollection fcNotUsed, int id = 0)
2: {
3: Movie movie = db.Movies.Find(id);
4: if (movie == null)
5: {
6: return HttpNotFound();
7: }
8: db.Movies.Remove(movie);
9: db.SaveChanges();
10: return RedirectToAction("Index");
11: }
Summary
You now have a complete ASP.NET MVC application that stores data in a local DB database. You can create, read, update, delete, and search for movies.
Next Steps
After you have built and tested a web application, the next step is to make it available to other people to use over the Internet. To do that, you have to deploy it to a web hosting provider. Microsoft offers free web hosting for up to 10 web sites in a free Windows Azure trial account. I suggest you next follow my tutorial Deploy a Secure ASP.NET MVC app with Membership, OAuth, and SQL Database to a Windows Azure Web Site. An excellent tutorial is Tom Dykstra’s intermediate-level Creating an Entity Framework Data Model for an ASP.NET MVC Application. Stackoverflow and the ASP.NET MVC forums are a great places to ask questions. Follow me on twitter so you can get updates on my latest tutorials.
Feedback is welcome.
— Rick Anderson twitter: [@RickAndMSFT](https://twitter.com/RickAndMSFT)
— Scott Hanselman twitter: [@shanselman](https://twitter.com/shanselman)
)
|
|